It is okay to have low ambitions.

I agree STRONGLY with this Tumblr post. People should be ABLE to work at the grocery store and make enough to support a family. That is how a functional society works. Grocery store workers (and other people in the service sector) are absolutely essential members of our society, and should not be disrespected and told that their jobs are only suitable for children.

Screenshot of a Tumblr post discussing societal expectations regarding job ambition and income, featuring comments about working at Taco Bell and personal definitions of success.
A reflection on the value of low-ambition jobs in society, emphasizing the importance of fair wages for essential work.

(U) I used an AI assistant to generate alt text and a caption there. It did a good job. Interesting.

I used Google Drive’s Optical Character Recognition to OCR the text, so here’s that, too:

User “youthincare”:

people should be allowed to have low ambition, and also be able to feed a family on the salary of a cashier at a convenience store.

User “kidsomeday”:

My very first job was at Taco Bell, and most of us working there were horrible young adults with horrible young adult problems, but one of my coworkers was a woman in (I think) her 50s.

And us horrid young adults would ask her why she still worked at Taco Bell, because it was starter job and who would want to stay there forever? Her response?

“I make enough money to make sure I always have roses in my bedroom.”

This answer changed me as a person. It changed the way I thought about what makes someone successful, and made me step back and realize that I was so caught up in what I thought success and

happiness should mean that I didn’t know what I wanted them to mean.

Which is to say that sometimes ambition is making enough money to keep fresh roses in your bedroom, and you should be able to do that working at Taco Bell.


I like that.

And yes, low ambition means this person will never have a 7-bedroom house. That is OKAY. It is okay that not everyone will always be able to have the nicest and biggest things. But people should be able to have basic things on a basic salary: an apartment, health care, enough food to eat, access to information and education. It is a problem when people cannot have those things.

(And I know nobody argues with me anymore now that I’ve moved to this blog instead of Facebook; but if you want to go toe to toe on “frivolous” expenses, bring a real life budget and let’s dissect.)

Tithes

Today on the Internet I saw a post that said this:

Leave your church today.

Tithe by helping someone in need

God is not in a building

I replied:

Even when I was religious, I considered any charitable donation part of my tithe.

I have a still-religious friend who considers the portion of his taxes that go towards social welfare programs to be part of his.

There are many ways to be the Body of Christ in the world.

And I stand by that.

I should do that calculation myself, sometime. The back-of-the-envelope that I just did (62% of federal spending, 15% effective federal tax rate) gives me about 9% of my salary Helping People via taxes. That’s not too bad.

Scalzi on “Poor Little Rich People”

Really excellent essay here.

Poor Little Rich People

But that’s not surprising. The first essay I ever read by John Scalzi was “Being Poor,” twenty years ago; and it stuck with me.


Then someone in the comments posted this Substack link, about 100k, which is MUCH easier to feel poor on! You just have to live in a HCOL (high cost of living) area, and boom, you’re cooked. As the kids say.

And so now, let’s tug on that loose thread… I’m sure many of my left-leaning readers will say, “This is obvious, we have been talking about it for YEARS!” Yes, many of you have; but you were using language of emotion (“Pay a living wage!”) rather than showing the math. My bad for not paying closer attention; your bad for not showing your work or coming up with workable solutions. Let’s rectify it rather than cast blame.

The bit about how “a living wage” is not a useful phrase is spot on. We have to do math for this part. A living wage in NYC is not a living wage in Galax.

I had seen a quote from that Substack going around on Bluesky the other day, and I do have some quibbles with it. Specifically, the 21k for “other essentials” part, plus the fact that it doesn’t control for location. But for my part of the country? It’s pretty much there.