Disentanglement

A few years back, I read this essay about “The Most Skipped Step” (when opening up a monogamous relationship).

The post itself is specifically about the context of Non-Monogamy or Polyamory. However, I find it useful even for monogamous contexts, because it’s very important for the members of a couple to retain their autonomy and identity as individuals, even when they are exclusively having sex and romantic relationships with each other and no one else.

Our society prioritizes and elevates sexual and romantic relationships above all else; but our platonic connections with our friends are also important, and can be just as (or more) important than our romantic/sexual ones. If you fall ill, your spouse is likely to be your primary caretaker; but caregiving is hard work, and should never fall on just one person. This is where The Village comes in. And having strong loving friendships is so important for that kind of resilience and endurance.

So, without further ado: the essay!

https://medium.com/@PolyamorySchool/the-most-skipped-step-when-opening-a-relationship-f1f67abbbd49

I have been informed that the author of this essay is Problematic. I do not know the details; I’m just noting this as a reminder that we should read everything with a critical eye and really try to analyze it, not absorb it uncritically. (I expect you all to read my posts critically as well.)

Essay: The Crisis of Gender Relations

My friend sent me this essay today, and it’s very good.

https://www.liberalcurrents.com/the-crisis-of-gender-relations/

What this has meant for women is a society in which they have options outside the patriarchal bargain. Simply working for a wage is enough to provide the security that once husbands exclusively controlled. Or, to put it more intuitively: the rise of two-income households isn’t a result of economic hardship. It’s a result of economic growth.

Go read it.

On groups and dyads

A variety of painful circumstances in my life recently have crystallized out a thought, for me: as much as we want a Group to be a cohesive unit, the group is only as strong as the strength of its various dyadic friendships.

When a group that had been constructed around one central Hub Person implodes, the continuance of the group is dependent on whether any of the Spoke People had actually formed individual (“dyadic”) friendships with each other. Without those interconnected friendships, the group would wither away without its Hub. (And maybe that’s why some Hubs feel threatened when they’re no longer the gatekeepers of access to the other friends?)

And when a large enough group (40 or so people) forms, not everyone will be as close to everyone else in that group; so it’s up to the individuals to build (or not build) their friendships with one another. If one person is having a crisis and reaches out, I am finding that sometimes, a larger group is *less* likely to respond. It’s the small six person chats that get things done for each other; or it’s an existing dyadic friendship within the larger circle that recognizes the need and answers it.

Is this the Bystander Effect in action? Are the larger groups prone to feeling too helpless to help? Someone else will do it?

Is this an effect of geography? Some of my Discords are pretty geographically dispersed, and I think that makes it harder (though not impossible) to build those sturdier connections.

It can also be hard to know what/how someone needs help. With closer individual bonds, there’s more of a chance that the person helping will actually help, versus accidentally making things worse. (I know that’s a thing for me as well: I’ve made things worse so often.)

But I just had an absolutely terrible week, and all kinds of people came to my rescue; and I am so grateful. And I witnessed someone else leave a group because they weren’t getting the support they needed, and my heart aches for them; but we were never directly close with each other, either, so I felt too distant (geographically and emotionally) to help. So it goes.

But anyway, my point in all this rambling is: If you are in a large friend group, make sure you aren’t neglecting the individual connections with individual people. In the end, “The Group” is a legal fiction. The people that help you move are the real individual humans that you can bond with, or not, as life takes you.

But try to take care of each other. Yes, The Village is built on unpaid labor. It’s transactional even though it’s not tracked, or shouldn’t be tracked, because Village Support is about having help with specific concrete actions that need doing.

I don’t know. I’m rambling and tired. But just. Look for the helpers; and be the helpers, when you can.

Easy Budgets by Michelle Singletary

This column by Michelle Singletary really gets at the meat of how to make a simple budget. (It’s basically what I do.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/01/10/easy-budget-no-app/

  1. Write down all the money that’s coming in.
  2. Write down all the money that’s going out.
  3. Set limits on your spending.
  4. Do the math. (I use Excel/Google spreadsheets for this.)

This format might not work for everyone – I have friends who swear by You Need A Budget (YNAB), for example – but it works pretty well for me.

“Everyone Will Not Just”

I recently discovered this Tumblr meme, which is apparently quite old, and I appreciate it a great deal. 

Everyone will not just
If your solution to some problem relies on “If everyone would just…” then you do not have a solution. Everyone is not going to just. At not time in the history of the universe has everyone just, and they’re not going to start now.

I appreciate the pragmatism of this outlook. Because yep, that’s…basically how humans work. 

A wise post about circuit breakers and grief overload

Today, my friend sent me this essay from 2021, and it resonates with me today.

https://thecorners.substack.com/p/if-you-cant-take-in-anymore-theres

Please care for your own hearts. Let the breaker do its job. Don’t wire it shut to force yourself to care about and try to fix every problem you encounter.

Do less.

Don’t do nothing. But you are allowed to do less.

Meme image from Reddit: a circuit breaker wired shut/on.

Long walk in, long walk out

Today on the Internet, I saw a commenter talk about how her relationship with her partner was a “long walk in, long walk out” one: i.e. that they moved slowly in building it up, and if they ever decided to break up, they committed to talking about it first and working on any problems they had.

I really like that attitude/philosophy towards relationships.