“Everyone Will Not Just”

I recently discovered this Tumblr meme, which is apparently quite old, and I appreciate it a great deal. 

Everyone will not just
If your solution to some problem relies on “If everyone would just…” then you do not have a solution. Everyone is not going to just. At not time in the history of the universe has everyone just, and they’re not going to start now.

I appreciate the pragmatism of this outlook. Because yep, that’s…basically how humans work. 

A wise post about circuit breakers and grief overload

Today, my friend sent me this essay from 2021, and it resonates with me today.

https://thecorners.substack.com/p/if-you-cant-take-in-anymore-theres

Please care for your own hearts. Let the breaker do its job. Don’t wire it shut to force yourself to care about and try to fix every problem you encounter.

Do less.

Don’t do nothing. But you are allowed to do less.

Meme image from Reddit: a circuit breaker wired shut/on.

Midnight hot takes

  1. Countries deserve to continue existing even if their governments are bad
  2. Living in a democracy does not make you culpable for any crimes its leaders commit

Family politics: education funds

If you are the parent of a young child, and a family member offers to pay for their education, you thank them politely and then conduct your planning as though they are contributing $0.

Exception #1: if they show you the statements every year and have a coherent plan for how they will conduct themselves if the child does not conform to their expectations of behavior, how this savings account interacts with the Medicaid clawback period, etc. Then you can safely count on the dollar value you see.

Exception #2: they write you a check for you to deposit into the child’s 529 plan.


Note that you can start saving for a future child’s education before that child exists, in most states. Create a 529 investment account with yourself as both Owner and Beneficiary; then, when the child is born, transfer Beneficiary to the child. You remain the Owner.


If you are a grandparent who plans to contribute to a child’s education, you need to first research the cost of a college education in the state where your grandchild resides. I had a friend whose in-law did the thing in the first section here, and it turned out they had saved exactly $500. Her child (expected to graduate in 2031) will probably have college costs three orders of magnitude greater than that.

You do not have an obligation to cover the entirety of anyone’s education, of course. But we are grandparents of action; lies do not become us. A lot of people in my parents’ generation seemingly think that college still costs $250 a semester despite what they paid for OUR education.


If you are the parent of a high-school aged child who is looking at colleges, you need to be explicitly clear with them about what you can and cannot afford to contribute to their education. Morally speaking, you also owe them help with filling out the FAFSA. I’ve heard enough horror stories of people whose parents refused to “give the government that information” (IRS notwithstanding) and denied their children any opportunity at grants or scholarships.

I still remember a high school friend whose parents just didn’t tell her how much they could afford, allowed her to get her heart set on a private college in the northeast, and then told her they could only afford in-state and she’d have to make up the rest in loans. She was extremely sad to have to give up her first choice school, even though she absolutely made the right decision in going to an in-state public school rather than taking out loans. Her parents should have been realistic from the start. If you are a parent in this situation: swallow your pride and be honest and clear with your child.

Long walk in, long walk out

Today on the Internet, I saw a commenter talk about how her relationship with her partner was a “long walk in, long walk out” one: i.e. that they moved slowly in building it up, and if they ever decided to break up, they committed to talking about it first and working on any problems they had.

I really like that attitude/philosophy towards relationships.

Satisficing: you don’t have to give 100% of yourself

Today I saw this Instagram video about how “give 100%” doesn’t mean you have to give 100% of yourself, but rather give 100% of your available resources.

It’s sort of like looking at your gross income vs your net income (after taxes) vs your take-home pay (after retirement, savings, investment, etc are taken care of). (Note that some people use that collection of words differently!)

The fact that I do NOT have to spend my entire being on Being The Best I Can Possibly Be is something I figured out in my twenties, and in my mind it’s closely linked to the concept of “Satisficing.” Basically, that’s a portmanteau of Satisfy and Suffice. Something that is “good enough” but “not optimal” would fall into this category, because it’s not possible to fully optimize everything ever. You would just burn out.